# \[4.6.3-op24\] Known bugs

**URL:** <https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455>\
**Category:** Router\
**Tags:** Featured\
**Created:** [August 26, 2024, 6:17pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455 "2024-08-26T18:17:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2024, 6:17pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/1 "2024-08-26T18:17:14Z")

</div>

In regards to the firmware **release candidate** [4.6.3-op24](https://dl.gl-inet.com/router/mt6000/) (OpenWrt 24) from 15th of August for MT6000 (Flint2), please report if you have any issue:

- PPPoE
- Wireless transfer speed - 2.4GHz
- Wireless transfer speed - 5GHz / DFS
- WPA3 Authentication
- DNS over HTTPS / TLS
- Ethernet transfer speed
- Adguard Home
- VPN (OpenVPN) client/server
- VPN (Wireguard) client/server
- Network storage
- Tailscale
- Abnormal log entries

P.S. it's available also for [MT3000 (Beryl AX)](https://dl.gl-inet.com/router/mt3000/) and for [MT2500 (Brume 2)](https://dl.gl-inet.com/router/mt2500/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![admon](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/admon/32/32880_2.png) [@admon](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/admon)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2024, 7:10pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/2 "2024-08-26T19:10:48Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thinner3614](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/5e9695/32.png) [@Thinner3614](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Thinner3614)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2024, 9:52pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/3 "2024-08-26T21:52:41Z")

</div>

I hope the developers will include the latest M76 driver updates ([mt76: update to Git HEAD (2024-08-25) · openwrt/openwrt@ecfb095 · GitHub](https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/ecfb0958663ee339667284f0ab0843a1a12123d3)). Mediatek has fixed important bugs from the Filogic line as well ([0fdbc0e6d84bbc0216da2842a494bdf01f745c6c - openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds - Gitiles](https://git01.mediatek.com/plugins/gitiles/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/+/0fdbc0e6d84bbc0216da2842a494bdf01f745c6c))

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slesar](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/slesar/32/13581_2.png) [@slesar](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/slesar)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2024, 6:16am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/4 "2024-08-27T06:16:18Z")

</div>

I don't think bug for adguard home. It is 3rd party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2024, 6:42am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/5 "2024-08-27T06:42:21Z")

</div>

> [@Thinner3614](#):
>
> I hope the developers will include the latest M76 driver updates ([mt76: update to Git HEAD (2024-08-25) · openwrt/openwrt@ecfb095 · GitHub](https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/ecfb0958663ee339667284f0ab0843a1a12123d3)). Mediatek has fixed important bugs from the Filogic line as well ([0fdbc0e6d84bbc0216da2842a494bdf01f745c6c - openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds - Gitiles](https://git01.mediatek.com/plugins/gitiles/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/+/0fdbc0e6d84bbc0216da2842a494bdf01f745c6c))

Hi @bruce, is there any chance to have these updates added before releasing it as stable?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xize11](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/xize11/32/5340_2.png) [@xize11](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/xize11)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2024, 7:07am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/6 "2024-08-27T07:07:48Z")

</div>

Yup i'd recommend updating them, it fixed the multicast crash for me on my ayaneo 👍, played twice about 4 hours without the wifi crashing, that was one of the only reasons to not recommend it for certain cases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2024, 10:17am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/7 "2024-08-27T10:17:42Z")

</div>

> [@slesar](#):
>
> I don't think bug for adguard home. It is 3rd party

Yep, but they are using 0.107.46 (from 20th of March).  
On the 4th of April was released the 0.107.47 due to the security issue;  
One day after (5th of April) was released another version due to a critical bug;  
And 0.107.48 and 0.107.49 were released in 3 days apart

I guess 0.107.52 is very stable (it was released on the 4th of July) and there is no relevant issue by now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![daoman789](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@daoman789](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/daoman789)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2024, 8:51pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/8 "2024-08-27T20:51:40Z")

</div>

I am on 4.6.3 release 2 on Flint 2.  
Unfortunately, I cannot install luci-app-sqm after the latest update. The UI shows an error with dependencies, and via SSH and running `opkg update && opkg install luci-app-sqm` it shows the following:

```auto
root@GL-MT6000:~# opkg update && opkg install luci-app-sqm
Downloading https://fw.gl-inet.com/releases/v24.x/v4.6/aarch64_cortex-a53/filogic/Packages.gz
Updated list of available packages in /var/opkg-lists/glinet_target
Downloading https://fw.gl-inet.com/releases/v24.x/v4.6/aarch64_cortex-a53/glinet/Packages.gz
Updated list of available packages in /var/opkg-lists/glinet_pub
Downloading https://fw.gl-inet.com/releases/v24.x/v4.6/aarch64_cortex-a53/packages/Packages.gz
Updated list of available packages in /var/opkg-lists/glinet_openwrt
Updating database.
Database update completed.
Multiple packages (libgcc1 and libgcc1) providing same name marked HOLD or PREFER. Using latest.
Installing luci-app-sqm (24.124.22943~208333b) to root...
Downloading https://fw.gl-inet.com/releases/v24.x/v4.6/aarch64_cortex-a53/packages/luci-app-sqm_24.124.22943~208333b_all_2.ipk
Collected errors:
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-sched-core
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-sched-cake
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-sched-cake found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-ifb
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-reject
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-ipt
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-log
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-nf-log found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-ipt-core
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nfnetlink
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-reject6
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-conntrack
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-conntrack6
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-nat
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nf-log6
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-nf-log6 found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-crypto-hash
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-crypto-crc32c
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-lib-crc32c
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-lib-crc32c found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nft-core
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-nft-core found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-nft-compat
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-nft-compat found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
 * pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1) for kmod-ipt-ipopt
 * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for luci-app-sqm:
 * kernel (= 6.6.36~20067883eb53777b4242dfcf8a842848-r1)
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package luci-app-sqm.

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bruce](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/bruce/32/35649_2.png) [@bruce](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/bruce)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 4:29am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/10 "2024-08-28T04:29:40Z")

</div>

4.6.3-op24 has not been merged, but our codes have been updated.  
To merge in the next version firmware.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PanWise](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/858c86/32.png) [@PanWise](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/PanWise)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 6:44am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/11 "2024-08-28T06:44:03Z")

</div>

Please install the OPENWRT 24 labeled firmware. there was a problem with the BETA version of the firmware source and we have removed it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 7:18am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/12 "2024-08-28T07:18:27Z")

</div>

> [@bruce](#):
>
> To merge in the next version firmware

Next version means 4.6.4 or do you have plans to release a 4.6.3-ReleaseCandidate **2**?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bruce](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/bruce/32/35649_2.png) [@bruce](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/bruce)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 7:35am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/13 "2024-08-28T07:35:03Z")

</div>

Perhaps in 4.6.4.

4.6.3-op24 is in RC. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slesar](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/slesar/32/13581_2.png) [@slesar](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/slesar)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 8:11am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/14 "2024-08-28T08:11:17Z")

</div>

Realese from who? GL inet or adguard home?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 8:27am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/15 "2024-08-28T08:27:26Z")

</div>

> [@bruce](#):
>
> Perhaps in 4.6.4.
> 
> 4.6.3-op24 is in RC

Without those merges, the users will find multicast crashes as reported by @xize11

Is much better to delay the 4.6.3-op24 with this bug fixed instead of releasing it soon with a known bug.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 8:29am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/16 "2024-08-28T08:29:14Z")

</div>

> [@slesar](#):
>
> Realese from who?

> **[Versions history | AdGuard](https://adguard.com/en/versions/home/release.html)**
>
> Download and learn about AdGuard versions — latest version, release date, version history, patches, features, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xize11](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/xize11/32/5340_2.png) [@xize11](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/xize11)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 9:09am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/17 "2024-08-28T09:09:35Z")

</div>

Its this commit [mt76: update to Git HEAD (2024-08-25) · openwrt/openwrt@ecfb095 · GitHub](https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/ecfb0958663ee339667284f0ab0843a1a12123d3) with the mediatek firmware updated: [0fdbc0e6d84bbc0216da2842a494bdf01f745c6c - openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds - Gitiles](https://git01.mediatek.com/plugins/gitiles/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/+/0fdbc0e6d84bbc0216da2842a494bdf01f745c6c)

It has alot of fixes 👍, but the mt76 did had a massive update but i think most is fixed now in the openwrt commit i linked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slesar](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/slesar/32/13581_2.png) [@slesar](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/slesar)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 10:52am UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/18 "2024-08-28T10:52:28Z")

</div>

From Adguard Home right? So it is not known bug with GL inet! Remove list adguard home in 1st post. 🤨

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 12:31pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/19 "2024-08-28T12:31:27Z")

</div>

If there is a bug, it's [another reason](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/dns-over-quic-problem-in-adguardhome/46480/4) to use 0.107.52 instead of 0.107.46 that GL-iNet is insisting to use.

Why keep using a version of AGH with known issues where there is a newer version available wihtout issues?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slesar](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/user_avatar/forum.gl-inet.com/slesar/32/13581_2.png) [@slesar](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/slesar)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 5:45pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/20 "2024-08-28T17:45:19Z")

</div>

Because someone modified config.yaml in adguard home then usually problems but not fault by gl inet staff.  
Default was not auto update adguard home.

Also your issue is adguard home, not GL inet side and not bug.  
However, your issue is syntax error upstream or isp/vpn blocked quic protocols?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renato](https://forum-assets.gl-inet.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@Renato](https://forum.gl-inet.com/u/Renato)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2024, 6:24pm UTC](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455/21 "2024-08-28T18:24:10Z")

</div>

> [@slesar](#):
>
> Because someone modified config.yaml in adguard home then usually problems but not fault by gl inet staff.

Let me write once again:

The 0.107.47 was released to fix a **security** issue on the 0.107.46 (which is the standard version on GL-iNet firmware.

So, 0.107.46 is not a good option.

One day after was released another version due to a critical bug.

So, 0.107.48 is not a good option.

0.107.48 and 0.107.49 were released in 3 days apart to fix some bugs.

Etc, etc, etc...

The most stable version is 0.107.52 (this is the best option to choose)

If you cannot understand this, then read once again, check the Release Notes and release dates.

And... Let's be more collaborative:

- Are you testing the Firmware 4.6.3-op24 RC?
- If so, did you notice any bug?

[Next page](https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/4-6-3-op24-known-bugs/46455.md?page=2)
