Allow Remote Access LAN - how does this work?

antifascista · 2022-11-21T20:40:20.672Z

scottgs:

I have added 192.168.0.1/24

You have to insert 192.168.0.0/24 to access your local subnet.

scottgs · 2022-11-21T21:17:28.663Z

Insert it where?

One of the first things I did was put the LAN network “192.168.0.1/24” into the client “Allowed IPs” configuration.
I’ve actually done, and undone, this at least 20 times. Never solves the problem.

Is there somewhere else it needs to go?

Thanks

scottgs · 2022-11-21T21:22:05.159Z

Here’s a screen capture. Please take a look and tell me if it’s still wrong?
I know the address of 192.168.1.X is not the same as 192.168.0.X. I was experimenting with trying a different subnet.

Client config Test7

antifascista · 2022-11-21T22:49:21.512Z

First connect only the wan of your gl-inet router to your main router and disconnect lan from it then insert 192.168.0.0/24 in alloweds ip of WG client config.
In WG server of gl-inet router enable “Allow Remote Access LAN”.

scottgs · 2022-11-21T23:35:52.762Z

Ok Thanks for the help!

If I disconnect the LAN port, I’m thinking that I have no way to talk to the GL-AR300 router for configuration? But I’ll try it right now.

For the other:

Inserting the allowed IP 192.168.0.1/24, or 192.168.0.0/24
selecting “Allow Remote Access LAN” at the server

As I posted, and showed in the screenshots, I’ve done this over and over and over and over and over again, for days, all to no avail. So either I’m doing it wrong, or something else is wrong, or it just doesn’t work.

Do my screenshots look ok?

Thanks again.

scottgs · 2022-11-21T23:59:41.525Z

I just tested it, and if I disconnect the LAN port on the GL-AR300 router, I can no longer reach the router’s management interface. Is there something else I need to do, in order to for it work both the LAN and WAN through the WAN port?

Anyway, I’m still stuck and it won’t work.

yuxin.zou · 2022-11-22T01:36:38.948Z

First, the LAN segment where your PC is located cannot be 192.168.0.0/x.
Next, check the routing on your PC. With AllowedIPs configured and the wireguard client running, execute the following command.

route print
tracert 192.168.0.100

scottgs · 2022-11-22T02:10:47.415Z

I don’t believe the LAN segment where my remote laptop PC is, is 192.168.0.0/x, but I believe it is 10.0.0.3.

Look at the screen shots which I previously attached. Am I misunderstanding?

Here’s the results of the print route and tracert

NOTE: my network devices that I care about reaching are in the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. But I’d be incredibly super happy to be able to route to either 192.168.1.0/24 or the 192.168.0.0/24 subnets.

C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>route print

Interface List
81…WireGuard Tunnel
20…20 c6 eb 8f 03 c9 …Intel(R) Ethernet Connection (3) I218-LM
77…00 ff f7 82 86 3a …TAP-Windows Adapter V9 for OpenVPN Connect
46…4c 34 88 4f 8c 07 …Microsoft Wi-Fi Direct Virtual Adapter
19…4e 34 88 4f 8c 06 …Microsoft Wi-Fi Direct Virtual Adapter #2
37…94 8d 84 58 52 5d …Generic Mobile Broadband Adapter #18
41…4c 34 88 4f 8c 06 …Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
1…Software Loopback Interface 1

IPv4 Route Table

Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 100.90.204.26 100.90.204.25 311
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 On-link 10.0.0.4 0
10.0.0.4 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.4 256
100.90.204.24 255.255.255.252 On-link 100.90.204.25 311
100.90.204.25 255.255.255.255 On-link 100.90.204.25 311
100.90.204.27 255.255.255.255 On-link 100.90.204.25 311
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 331
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 331
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 331
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.0.0.4 0
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.4 256
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 331
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 100.90.204.25 311
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 331
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 100.90.204.25 311

Persistent Routes:
None

IPv6 Route Table

Active Routes:
If Metric Network Destination Gateway
37 311 ::/0 2600:1004:b101:4636:bc5a:e992:9416:c917
37 311 ::/0 fe80::bc5a:e992:9416:c917
1 331 ::1/128 On-link
37 311 2600:1004:b101:4636::/64 On-link
37 311 2600:1004:b101:4636:1d17:23de:4e8f:c0a8/128
On-link
37 311 2600:1004:b101:4636:2631:c168:aaa0:92ce/128
On-link
37 311 2600:1004:b101:4636:fc85:64fa:4cbb:4416/128
On-link
37 311 fe80::/64 On-link
37 311 fe80::1208:c511:a05c:2c3b/128
On-link
1 331 ff00::/8 On-link
37 311 ff00::/8 On-link

Persistent Routes:
None

C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>tracert 192.168.0.100

Tracing route to 192.168.0.100 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 101 ms 56 ms 59 ms 10.0.0.1
2 54 ms 65 ms 58 ms 192.168.1.254
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 * * * Request timed out.
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 * * * Request timed out.
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 * * * Request timed out.
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 * * * Request timed out.
17 * * * Request timed out.
18 * * * Request timed out.
19 * ^C
C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>
C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>tracert 192.168.1.100

Tracing route to 192.168.1.100 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 105 ms 56 ms 57 ms 10.0.0.1
2 10.0.0.1 reports: Destination host unreachable.

Trace complete.

yuxin.zou · 2022-11-22T02:37:23.007Z

scottgs:

I believe it is 10.0.0.3.

I am referring to the LAN IP(The IP segment of the Ethernet or WLAN on your PC) and not the virtual IP on the wireguard.

scottgs · 2022-11-22T02:48:35.894Z

I’m not seeing where my remote PC is on the 192.168.0.x/24 LAN segment?

I’m connecting through a cellular modem that is integral to the remote PC.

But, I’m not very familiar with this, so I may need help understanding where to look?

yuxin.zou · 2022-11-22T02:55:46.957Z

scottgs:

1 101 ms 56 ms 59 ms 10.0.0.1
2 54 ms 65 ms 58 ms 192.168.1.254
3 * * * Request timed out.

From here, the packet trying to access 192.168.0.100 reaches 192.168.1.254 with VPN. is it your device?

scottgs · 2022-11-22T02:57:52.381Z

Yes, 192.168.1.254 is the LAN router/gateway/firewall to the internet on my Home LAN, not on the remote laptop PC.

Referencing the diagram, it’s the “Router Switch” Blue box.
All of the 192.168.“0”.x addresses are now 192.168.“1”.x

VPN Simplified Block Diagram1012×538 72 KB

yuxin.zou · 2022-11-22T03:33:21.576Z

So the IP of the NAS is now 192.168.1.100?
So if you tracert 192.168.1.100 or tracert 192.168.1.12 on your PC, will it reach it?

scottgs · 2022-11-22T04:00:15.130Z

No, the NAS is now 192.168.1.10

No, a tracert from the remote laptop PC will not reach 192.168.1.10, and it will not reach 192.168.1.12. I cannot reach anything on the 192.168.1.x subnet, except for 192.168.1.253, which is the GL-AR300M VPN server.

C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>tracert 192.168.1.10
Tracing route to 192.168.1.10 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 100 ms 57 ms 58 ms 10.0.0.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * ^C

C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>tracert 192.168.1.12
Tracing route to 192.168.1.12 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 96 ms 57 ms 56 ms 10.0.0.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * ^C

C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>tracert 192.168.1.253
Tracing route to 192.168.1.253 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 51 ms 62 ms 56 ms 192.168.1.253
Trace complete.

C:\Users\TOUGHBOOK 31 MK5>

yuxin.zou · 2022-11-22T07:23:35.293Z

If 10.0.0.1 is the virtual IP on your AR300M, then the router appears to have no problems.
Because your AllowedIPs already contain 0.0.0.0/0, the routing table is correct even if 192.168.1.0/24 is not added. Traffic packets will also reach the gateway correctly.

Please check LuCI → Network → Firewall on the AR300M and make sure that wgserver → lan is accepted.

image965×533 38.3 KB

scottgs · 2022-11-22T21:30:06.138Z

This is what I show for LuCi → Network → Firewall

Luci - Network Firewall1023×633 94.9 KB

scottgs · 2022-11-22T21:41:43.070Z

FIXED!!!

I added the entry for the wgserver, and it fixed it!!! WHEW!!!

You guys need to get this into your default software for the GL-AR300M !!!

Here is what I show now in the LuCI → Network → Firewall:

Luci - Network Firewall _FIXED1023×623 100 KB

Brian25 · 2023-10-11T01:06:59.582Z

Moving to another thread. I think the problem is with the devices on the LAN not having gateway defined.

virtu789 · 2023-10-11T12:35:58.994Z

I’m not advanced and don’t know if it matters, but I noticed your IP range is defined from x.x.x.100 to x.x.x.249, yet your static assignments are to x.x.x.11 and x.x.x.10 - outside of that range. Could that be causing problems?

turian · 2024-06-18T09:20:47.323Z

I had the same problem and I resolved it using your screenshot, thank you so much!

image1235×591 54 KB