inot
15
I guess we’re really seeing the limitations of the CPU - I wasn’t aware of the overhead of filesystem operations. I’m still unsure of how much of it is SMB and how much is the filesystem drive and how much is ‘other’. Is there any potential in an alternative to SMB such as NFS? The answer relies on the question previous - if most of the slowdown is SMB then switching to NFS could make up the difference.
Is there any potential in zero copy options? I am barely aware of what that even means, but if it could bypass the kernel or unnecessary copying it could greatly increase the performance. SMB has SMB Direct which uses RDMA - but it looks like it requires specialized hardware?chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.samba.org/~metze/presentations/2018/SDC/StefanMetzmacher_SDC2018-SMB-Direct-Status-rev1-presentation.pdf
I’ve just decided to change my requirements and no longer need to stream at 10MB/s.