The WebUI on the Beryl is a bit different from my Mango2. I wonder if install package is trying to modify pages that are no longer there or have been changed / re-designed, etc.
can i check with you about this per-host- isolation
is it the same setting for wwan interface and wlan interface? their ingress egress are opposites
from man page tc-cake(8) - Linux manual page
dual-srchost
Flows are defined by the 5-tuple, and fairness is applied
first over source addresses, then over individual flows. Good
for use on egress traffic from a LAN to the internet, where it’ll
prevent any one LAN host from monopolising the uplink, regardless
of the number of flows they use.
dual-dsthost
Flows are defined by the 5-tuple, and fairness is applied
first over destination addresses, then over individual flows.
Good for use on ingress traffic to a LAN from the internet, where
it’ll prevent any one LAN host from monopolising the downlink,
regardless of the number of flows they use.
so yes beware where you apply sqm and advanced options, usually is best to apply cake with per host isolation to wan interface to avoid trouble 
Wondering if someone could explain something to me:
I haven’t logged into my velica for while, finally did and saw Cake was available to choose. So, obviously I chose it.
But, when I run either tc- s qdisc or tc -d qdisc I do not see the word cake - instead I see fq_codel.
Just curious, why this would be - does anyone have any insight?
I’m suprised nobody answered you.
I took this straight from OpenWrt documentation:
piece_of_cake.qos This just uses the cake qdisc as a replacement for htb as shaper and fq_codel as leaf qdisc. It just does not come any simpler than this, in other words it truely is a “piece of cake”. This script requires that cake is selected as qdisc. See: http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake for more information
Can we still use this?
Do you have any pics I can follow from?
on the wiki page it’s says ( nat duel-dsthost ) you’ve put nat-duel dsthost ingress which one do I put in? 
Thank you
Try nat dual-dsthost ingress for incoming(ingress)
thanks for releasing firmware 4.3.2 beta 1 to mt300n-v2 (mango)
i flashed it successfully via uboot
I tried to install the luci-app-sqm plugin but returns following error:
Collected errors:
- pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency kmod-sched-cake for sqm-scripts
- pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for sqm-scripts found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
- satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for luci-app-sqm:
- kmod-sched-cake
- opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package luci-app-sqm.
other non sqm qos plugin related issues with this firmware for mango:
- advanced page (luci) is in Chinese
- no firewall custom rules page (/cgi-bin/luci/admin/network/firewall/custom)
Hi,
I have changed from version 3.xx to 4.68 Flint, when configuring SMQ I noticed that many functions do not show any difference. I have a pppoe connection, use Cake and scripts piece_of_cake or Layer_cake.
Already with the interface selection: Whether ‘pppoe-wan’ or ‘eth0’ both work good and no difference in the bufferbloat test, is that how it should be?
when using Layer_cake.qos I have prioritised my PC in the firewall.user file, with speedtest/ping test, the latency jumps higher than if I only use the piece_of_cake. shouldn't this work better with layer and the PC prio ?
now a question about the tcpdump test: tcpdump -i pppoe-wan -v host 192.168.8.130
with the interface pppoe-wan or eth0 to the host it shows me no connection, only with br-lan, is that correct, or is something wrong ?
I hope someone can tell me something about this so that I can understand the whole thing better, thank you very much.
Tom