Completely agree with this.
They need to improve releases, also check upon them rather than blindly unchecked check on the community, it's not feasible to expect from consumers to be beta testers, consumers/software need to be safe guarded.
As a example:
To me it's free, so I'm not hurt that it is cold bricked, but this shouldn't be expected from normal consumers who paid the full price, it is extremely unresponsive behaviour.
Sure every PSA is fine, but the PSA also needs to be tested before posted / released as in software.
I assume with my example it isn't tested with the Brume by GL-iNet, but maybe my assumption can be taken away if they give a awnser if theres a hw difference in the beta test model, with the given steps this would be a very unresponsive u-boot release.