Hi, I have a Flint 2 running version 4.8.3 op24. Now when I access the router, it suggests updating to version 4.8.4 stable.
Is this version based on op21?
If so, why is this update being suggested when I already have a version based on op24?
Also, what improvements does this update bring?
And if I decide to update, I won’t be able to keep any of my configuration, correct?
really…. what is this update…. I was in op24, I didn't login in the router since weeks, now I access and see an update, apply it without thinking much…. it's now on op21…. seriously??? I'll just flash stock owrt 25, really this is too bad…
yes that's what I did, my mistake, I always think twice but this time I tought Yeah it's since weeks I don't check let's go for it change log is just fixes how can be bad update… somehow everything is working fine, but my config is super simple just adguard and WiFi, nothing else, and tmr will just wipe it for vanilla owrt
Hmm I did not know about this, but if it is true what I read here that a OP24 firmware requests a MTK SDK version on 21, then this is terrible wrong even in a auto update setting.
It doesn't mather here when a rollback safely happened, they really need to be abstracted into two distinct completely different flavours with their own separated update channels or very ugly things could happen, this is also the reason why OpenWrt doesn't support help for other forks and offshoots they should belong to other maintain and update channels.
I have seen what happens if a configuration corruption of dnsmasq happens, no dhcp, i dont think the dhcp differ much but wifi absolutely will.
The problem is the release is targeted on the gl sdk which is purely the ui and vpn functions, and on the mtk sdk and qsdk it is higher maintained than the OP24 build, but op24 should not follow mtk sdk release.
@bruce is there not a way to have a extra check between such images on the gl sdk part ?
I mean if there once gets a situation there are differences in partitions in a new future device, the user may get a error shown but they may just click upgrade which then makes the router cold bricked, i don't like this idea, the abstraction is really needed.
This is odd. I’m running 4.8.3 (op24) and don’t get any suggestion to upgrade. In the GUI’s Upgrade panel it says “Firmware is up-to-date”.
A month or two ago developers requested I load specially patched firmware to aid in debugging a problem, so that Upgrade panel also shows Firmware Type as “debug”. Is this why I’m not seeing (the definitely unwanted) suggestion to move to 4.4 (op21)?
Avoid this release. It has an issue with DNS (DoH) and the WiFi signal takes a significant hit. I now no longer get WiFi in one room in my house where I did previously.
well technically speaking in this case, op24 and op21 versions are equivalent in terms of features The op24 version by glint is not a straight upgrade for op21 (both are version 4.8.x)