Flint firmware 4.1.0 release5 is out

ShockedTrout · 2022-11-10T13:40:25.234Z

Thanks, that has done the trick. All devices now showing rather than the one local interface.

wiuma · 2022-11-10T16:35:47.903Z

Don’t find a place for feature request.

A second wired port for wan/multiwan would be nice. (have a docis and vdsl line).

I think i can do it over luci and mwan3 but over the gl-inet interface would be nice.

motox22a · 2022-11-10T18:16:58.291Z

At the top… [List of current feature requests 2022]
Multiple people have mentioned that and gotten no response…But go ahead and put in a request there.

danbratu · 2022-11-11T04:41:37.276Z

Is it possible to add the option of IPoE with VLAN id (802.1q option) along with PPPoE for WAN interface? i know it can be done via LUCI but it will be nice to have in the default webgui as many ISPs in UK are using IPoE lately and basic DHCP will not establish internet connection without the possibility of adding VLAN Id…

netconf1411×502 58.9 KB

lord · 2022-11-11T10:50:03.809Z

@alzhao btw, when 4.1.0 will be officially released as stable?

mainufer · 2022-11-11T11:04:12.841Z

I have a question to the community regarding the GL AXT 1800 4.1.0 release. I am currently running the 4.0.3 with the latest AdguardHome release. This works without any trouble. I fowarded WAN port 53 to the internal AdguardHome 3053 port, so DNS requests are answered in my network by tAdguardHome. When I upgrade to the latest firmware version 4.1.0 AdguardHome stops working for me. Port forwarding is the same. Has something changed with firmware version 4.1.0?

alzhao · 2022-11-11T12:43:43.952Z

should not change anything.

Do you mean adguard home is not working or the dns forward is not working?

ShockedTrout · 2022-11-11T13:04:33.056Z

I had a few issues when upgrading to 4.1.0 and keeping my current settings. A clean install without saving any configs seemed to do the trick for me.
Not sure if that is possible in your situation?

XJIbIH · 2022-11-11T13:26:56.237Z

“Failed to update repository list, please check your network and try again.”
Everything is fine with the internet! Problems with repositories again?

K3rn3l_Ku5h · 2022-11-11T15:34:02.129Z

~~I have had the same problem the past 48hours, worked previosly.~~

~~!!!DON’T DO!!! Will update If my vpn is off and/or allow non-vpn traffic.~~
~~!!!Do not do !!!~~
Latest Repository broke my LAN DNS resolving some how, funny enough my phone was on the guest network and worked fine. Anything connected to the LAN will not resolve DNS. I can ping 8.8.8.8 but can’t ping www.google.com or google.com. Trying to figure out what happened.

Are you using a VPN? Does it only us IPv4?

It seems the repository config really wants to use IPv6.

K3rn3l_Ku5h · 2022-11-11T18:12:24.180Z

Fixed it the the VPN Policy route mode was set to auto detected and I switched it to client,

XJIbIH:

Zerotier can’t be installed again…
Collected errors:

pkg_hash_check_unresolved: cannot find dependency libstdcpp6 for zerotier

Libstdcpp6 is there now

XJIbIH · 2022-11-11T18:30:08.469Z

XJIbIH:

“Failed to update repository list, please check your network and try again.”

This is great news! Would… If…
“Failed to update repository list, please check your network and try again.”

K3rn3l_Ku5h · 2022-11-11T18:49:39.615Z

I had a problem I posted early and then rectified.

Are you using a VPN that only uses Ipv4?

mainufer · 2022-11-12T06:12:21.073Z

@alzhao, the routing isn’t working. I do the routing via Lucie. WAN port 53 to LAN port3053.
I already started from scratch, and installed the latest release, but no luck with the routing problem.
In version 4.0.3 I don’t run into this problem.

K3rn3l_Ku5h · 2022-11-12T12:05:14.351Z

should be Source zone LAN port 53 to Internal Zone LAN port 3053

mainufer · 2022-11-12T16:56:52.136Z

But the AXT-1800 isn’t the main router, that’s a Fritz!Box behind the WAN interface. The AXT-1800 only provides the AdguardHome DNS service via port 3053 which is by default not open to the WAN side, where others LAN devices are connected. And it worked with 4.0.3, but it doesn’t with the new firmware.
That’s my config with firmware 4.0.3 which is working:

image720×87 2.01 KB

K3rn3l_Ku5h · 2022-11-12T17:50:23.347Z

Is it the first rule?

Also I think you need to do something with firewall Zones.
I Found this somewhat useful and it explains the problem. Basically its not a clear communication of iptables to nftables from FW3 to FW4. I have avoided this because I installed SQM

OpenWrt Forum – 23 Apr 22

22.03.0-rc1 nftables/fw4 migration guide?

22.03.0-rc1 is now on the download pages, so it'll start getting some early adopter attention (such as me). With the switch to nftables (fw4), is there a migration guide in the works for custom rules? My initial questions: LuCI has two Firewall...

Reading time: 1 mins 🕑 Likes: 2 ❤

For the Backend “I will do it myself” people:

Red Hat Developer – 10 Jan 17

Migrating my iptables setup to nftables | Red Hat Developer

Wanting to become familiar with nftables, I decided to jump in at the deep end and just use it on my local workstation. The goal was to replace the existing iptables setup, ideally without any drawbacks. The following essay will guide you through...

mainufer · 2022-11-12T20:06:31.306Z

@K3rn3l_Ku5h, thanks for your answer. This would then answer my previous question if something has changed between 4.0.3 and 4.1.0. I will have a look into these articles, and try to get this running, once the release candidate for 4.1.0 is out.

i_fin · 2022-11-13T10:08:01.120Z

why can’t i add port range to port (only one by one port) forwards?

K3rn3l_Ku5h · 2022-11-14T13:48:22.280Z

I don’t think it can be done in the GL.iNet UI but can be done in LuCI or SSH. You are not going to be using the port forwording but changing options in the firewall list to allow a port range.

OpenWrt Forum – 23 Sep 22

Port Forwarding: multiple ports one rule, port range part 2

Hello, This is a follow up to closed topic below Since someone closed that topic and there was no resolution, I want to ask if things have changed with fw3/luci Is it possible to create multiple port forwarding rules ? Here is an example

Reading time: 1 mins 🕑 Likes: 1 ❤

OpenWrt Forum – 16 Mar 19

Port Forwarding: multiple ports one rule, port range

Firmware: OpenWrt 18.06.2 r7676-cddd7b4c77 / LuCI openwrt-18.06 branch (git-19.020.41695-6f6641d) I am trying to forward multiple ports to some devices. config redirect option target 'DNAT' option src 'wan' option dest 'lan' option proto 'tcp'...

Reading time: 1 mins 🕑 Likes: 8 ❤

OpenWrt Wiki – 15 Aug 18

Firewall configuration /etc/config/firewall

Firewall configuration /etc/config/firewall OpenWrt's firewall management application firewall is mainly configured through /etc/config/firewall. Most of the information in this wiki will focus on the configuration files and content. The LuCI and...

OpenWRT 22.03.x is migrating from FW3 to FW4 so rules don’t always carryover correctly.