i will stick to openwrt because when a device is blocked from internet,
others could still connect to it for samba etc; some commercials don’t allow. i am naive to set.
i heard business use double firewall to protect PCs; i know double NAT do the same;
but is it the way or they really use 2 firewalls instead of 2 NATs
is 2 NATs really so un-prefered? i used that for years, only recently with unstable problems.
i bought 2 opal because they are cheap. sales told me dont use on same network as
either the wifi name or the lan/device name wont show the last part to differentiate the two.
is it still the same now? as i found the new UI have longer space, in some UI it did show up the differenct e.g. sft1200-xxx vs -yyy