Same reason why modems don’t create a double NAT issue
To quote yourself:
[quote="Lastimosa, post:17, topic:68668"]
If that setup works for you, that’s great
[/quote]
If you don't want a feature because it doesn't work for your particular setup, or are willing to work around issues e.g by using tailscale, then I don't think this “feature request” thread is for you.
2 Likes
But unfortunately you would be in double NAT even in modem-only due to CGNAT used by mobile carriers. I say it again that this feature request is unnecessary and that there are many other features with a higher priority.
… to you. For example, I couldn’t care less about AdGuard nor Tailscale but I recognize those are important to others, so instead of downplaying their concerns I simply keep my gob shut
@Cathy Please get your Product Manager to sign this off as a feature as soon as possible. I have the exact same issue with my unifi set up at home and this feature would be perfect.
2 Likes