Anyone having issues with Netflix
could be Ad-Guard blocking server right?
Mostly it's VPN, not AdGuard.
Are you just using the default adguard list or did you load up others?
No, I only have AdGuard on the router, No VPN at all home ip.
Yes, Default AdGuard on router just enabled it no VPN but in the logs I see it block Roku & netflix logs. Wish I know how to whitelist Netflix streaming servers ![]()
Just so we are clear if you turn off adguard netflix has no issues correct?
See this post:
Leave AdGuard Home disabled unless you know how to configure and use it properly. Read the documentation first before enabling it.
Just go into your Adguard home settings page, then from the top menu, select the ‘Query Log’ menu, and from there you can select any blocked sites or services to make it easy to filter. Just look to see if there are any Netflix servers listed. If you find any, you can click the 3 vertical dots at the end of the line and unblock them.
Blocked under Streaming services?

Blocked under content filter?
Blocked under traffic stats?
(I do not use Netflix that is why all my images show NF as being blocked.)
Hey @Tom_GL-inet Disable the standard AdGuard home list and use HaGeZi's Pro Blocklist from the approved list. You can apply this via clicking Add Blocklist > Choose from list. I noticed the same issue with AdGuard blocking Netflix on certain devices but allowing on others, changing the list allowed it on all devices.
Also @skywizard DPI Content Filtering and AdGuard are different types of content filtering.
Further little update on this. If you’re using a Flint3, the snapshot build of 4.9.1 from 27/07/26 reduces the memory footprint of Adguard Home by about 10%, which is a big old improvement. Resolution and blocking also seem to be improved as well. They don’t mention anything in the compile list for Adguard, but something has definitely been tweaked.
What version of AdGuard is that - the default ADGH was an older version and I do a manual upgrade to the latest version so I wonder if that would still be the case with an updated ADGH. I am currently using ADGH :-1
AdGuard Version: v0.107.78
Just updated to test this @skywizard . .78 has increased the memory footprint but has drastically improved performance of AdGuard Home. I’ll monitor it over the course of the day, but I’ve gone from 475mb to about 500mb now.
Edit - Now it looks like it’s settled back down to a much smaller memory footprint and returned to 475mb total usage, which is pushing me to around 83% continuous usage, which leaves a little bit of wiggle room
I can't really comment because I am also running Docker and 1 container and Unbound with ADGH.
You asked whether the new version was showing similar behaviour of reducing the footprint. I was running the older version, so updated and I was answering your question. I’m not asking you to comment on the matter.
Oh, well excuse me, my humble appologies!
I was not aware I am not permitted to make comments anyway?
I will seek prior permission from you in the future before making any further posts.
You asked a question, which was answered, and then go on to mention that my answer to your question is irrelevant because you run other things along with the AGH process, so why did you ask whether the the new version behaves the same and then poo poo the answer….?
You logic doesn’t make sense.
You’re not very accommodating to new members @skywizard, maybe English isn’t your first language.
You logic doesn’t make sense.
I guess some things are hard to understand for some.... I was making the point that I am not using ADGH only but docker an Unbound so cannot comment on if my memory usage would be worth as a comparison. Is it really that hard?
You’re not very accommodating to new members @skywizard,
Toughen up cupcake - it is a big world out there.
maybe English isn’t your first language.
Groan. Really? Really? When all else fails, make stupid and dumb statements......
I admit I do have a bit more English to learn - I have only been using Australian English for the past 73 years, about 60 years longer than yourself I guess.

