Reading through this forum, there are many people who have had very good luck with the Beryl. In my personal experience with GL iNet routers running their firmware, I have had the best luck with their routers that:

  • Sell well, so their engineers focus on the product. In this forum, it has been stated by GI iNet staff that they focus their firmware work by how popular a product is.
  • Have been on the market for more then a year, so the engineers have time to work out the bugs.
  • Have a solid OpenWRT firmware version that has been released in the main tree.
  • That do not use the MediaTek chip-set with the proprietary drivers supplied by GL iNet. The GL iNet router that has cost me the most time and headaches has been a n300 with the MT chip-set. Please look through the forum on issues with MT based products.

My go to GL iNet travel routers which are using the GL iNet firmware, are an AR750s and an USB150, as I prefer the GL iNet interface while on travel. Both products are solid, but are not cutting edge. All my other GL iNet routers are now running generic OpenWRT or in a drawer not being used. Others will tell you the Beryl is fine, is faster, and is a better value, but due to past MT driver issues, I’m not buying one. I’m doing a lot of travel and I will give up speed for reliability as I need something I can quickly setup and use when I change places. I don’t have time to test different firmware and play with uboot while on the road.

:grinning: Just works is what I’m really looking for in a travel router :grinning:

1 Like