jdub
38
In addition to some of the reviews above, I thought I’d post my impressions.
I got my AXT-1800 in the mail on Thursday and have been playing around with it off and on as time allows. A few initial thoughts:
-
Anybody who is familiar with GL.iNet’s recent design philosophy will immediately recognize the AXT-1800. The build quality seems solid, though not really premium. That said, I am disappointed that GL.iNet continues to move the wrong direction in terms of size / weight. The AXT-1800 is larger in every dimension than the MT-1300, which itself was substantially larger than the MV-1000W or AR750S before it. As a point of reference, it weighs over 3x what the AR750S did. Frankly, calling it a “travel router” is starting to be a stretch.
-
That said, the performance is undeniably impressive. I’ve been doing some real world tests on downloads to a private VPN, and I’ve seen Wireguard speeds of close to 500mbps. Far more surprising, I’ve seen OpenVPN speeds above 200mbps, which exceeds the “lab” test numbers GL.iNet published. As someone who prefers OpenVPN to Wireguard, this is a pretty big game changer. In any event, the speeds are getting fast enough that for basically any practical real-world travel purpose both VPN technologies are faster than what you’ll get over a wireless link at a hotel.
-
There’s a reason for the size and performance above, and that is that the AXT-1800 is quite power hungry. I’ve seen it pull over 6W, and it sits between 3-4W at idle. That’s a lot of heat in a small device, and eagle eyed owners will notice that the AXT-1800 contains a fan (which I think is a first for a GL.iNet travel router), though mine has not turned on yet. It does get warm to the touch though, and obviously a major reason for the size increase is additional cooling.
-
The new 4.0 firmware is nice, but does have some quirks and features. The new VPN dashboard is a great improvement, but there doesn’t seem to be a way to use different username/password combinations with different OpenVPN servers within a single group. This isn’t a huge issue, but is kind of annoying. There also seems to be a regression while using encrypted microSD volumes on Samba. Fixable if you jump into real OpenWRT, but it would be nice if it were fixed in the main firmware.
Now some rough edges:
-
2.4G networking appears very slow. I was only able to get 20mbps or so while using the AXT-1800 as a client, but switching over to 5G jumps things to close to 300mbps (connected as client to Unifi WiFi 6 LR access point about 15 feet away). This isn’t really ideal in my general opinion, but it’s livable.
-
I’ve experienced a few random reboots here and there which I assume will be worked out in future firmware revisions. One was when using cryptsetup to format a microSD card - a couple of kernel panics I’m assuming. More concerning, the first time I tried to connect to a wireless network the router rebooted. It hasn’t happened again, but does seem worth mentioning.
-
GL.iNet seems to have made some … let’s go with unorthodox choices with regard to firmware. For example, OpenSSL is compiled with the OPENSSL_PREFER_CHACHA_OVER_GCM flag, even though openssl speed shows that aes-128-gcm is >2.5x faster than chacha20-poly1305 on the device. I understand why you might think that would be a good idea given the emphasis on Wireguard, but it seems like you’d prefer the faster cipher. Also, the AXT-1800 is running an armv7l version of OpenWRT, even though all available data suggests it uses a processor with Cortex A53 (armv8) cores. GL.iNet used an aarch64 build for the MV1000, so it’s odd that they’ve chosen the 32-bit route for the AXT-1800
-
Currently none of GL.iNet’s custom patches have been pushed back up into the main OpenWRT repository, which means those of us who like to do that sort of thing can’t make our own builds at the moment. They are generally pretty good about adding support eventually, but it would be nice to see it sooner rather than later (and hopefully on aarch64!)
All in all the AXT-1800 is larger and heavier than I’d like, but the performance makes it easier to forgive the size and weight compared to the MT-1300. If anyone at GL.iNet is reading, it seems like the ideal would be a router closer to the size of the AR750S with 1/2 the VPN performance of the AXT-1800, which would still be more than adequate for almost any (hotel) situation today. In any event, I’ll be taking it on a trip in a few weeks and will try to remember to report back on how it does.
10 Likes