I am looking to purchase a new set up to meet the following criteria as cheaply as possible.
Travel Router:
- Log in to WPA2-Enterprise Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) for work. Fibre: 92 Mb/s down 150Mb/s up.
- USB to connect 8TB WD Elements Desktop HDD for SMB sharing.
- Wireguard VPN to home exit node.
Home set up:
- 2 or 3 ethernet ports (1 to plug into ISP router/modem, 1 to plug into MoCA ethernet to coax network).
- USB to connect 8TB WD Elements Desktop HDD for SMB sharing.
- FTTB only. 60Mb/s down 16 Mb/s up.
Am I right in thinking the terrible home internet speed will hobble the setup so much that I may as well buy older kit?
My current thought is to get a Beryl AX for travel and a Brume 2 for home plugged into my ISP router for wifi. Total cost appx 100 euro.
What do you think?
So is the Beryl AX a better shout than say the Slate plus for WPA? The latter seems cheap and good enough. Different chip though.
Both the Beryl AX and the Slate Plus should work fine with WPA-EAP.
You may use our comparison list to see the differences between the two models:
Your plan actually makes sense for the speeds you mentioned. Since your home connection is only ~60/16 Mbps, buying very high-end hardware won’t give you much real benefit for the WireGuard exit node, because the upload speed (16 Mbps) will be the main bottleneck when you connect back home. The Beryl AX is a solid choice for travel. It supports Wi-Fi 6 and WPA2-Enterprise, and it should handle WireGuard and SMB sharing from the USB drive without issues at your current internet speeds.
For the home setup, Brume 2 is also reasonable as a small VPN gateway connected to your ISP router. It’s efficient for WireGuard exit node usage and should easily handle your connection speed.
So overall your ~€100 setup (Beryl AX + Brume 2) is practical and cost-effective. Upgrading to newer Wi-Fi 7 travel routers wouldn’t really improve performance unless your home internet speed increases significantly.