WireGuard and GL-AXT1800 (Two WireGuard connections at the same time)

TSK7MDE · 2022-11-17T15:16:56.333Z

I have now configured the whole thing via the Advanced (Luci). It works perfectly with the two tunnels.
Of course it would be great if you could do it all with the GL.iNet GUI (The adjustment shouldn’t take that long for the GUI)

I think the GUI should be revised and allow more than one tunnel from each instance in Route Mode with Customize Routing Rules (WG, OpenVPN).

alzhao · 2022-11-18T07:53:48.017Z

TSK7MDE:

I think the GUI should be revised and allow more than one tunnel from each instance in Route Mode with Customize Routing Rules (WG, OpenVPN).

This was on the dev schedule actually. Just too big change in firmware 4.x and have to make everthing work correct now before adding more features.

wcs2228 · 2022-11-18T17:38:51.566Z

If or when you add the feature, allow any number of of Wireguard/OpenVPN connections, or someone will request it later

johng · 2023-02-02T11:54:43.195Z

To who it may concern,
I’d also like to use this feature from the main GUI as well as assigning clients to each of the VPN tunnels for different services from each VPN connection.
Regards
John

marcog · 2023-02-15T19:57:01.310Z

This would be a killer feature for me. When I travel with family I would like to have multiple Wireguard client connections at the same time, one which provides my devices admin access to my infrastructure, the other one which just secures internet access for the rest of my family.
So multiple VPN clients running at the same time + the ability to route devices connected to those VPNs

Fox · 2023-04-14T05:45:28.903Z

I am also looking for this! I was hoping to route traffic through 2 VPNs by policy (IP/domain), so that all google stuff goes through one VPN and my remaining traffic goes through the second VPN.

Also, thank you all for the hard work and long support life of your devices.

fjbo · 2023-05-13T00:39:58.343Z

It would be pretty handy! I’m interested in that feature too. Thanks for your work!

Wild_Spy · 2023-06-07T08:14:26.890Z

I also need something similar!

I’d like to use one WG connection with a per-domain policy like I have now. And the second WG connection only for guest Wi-Fi. Is it possible now?

yuxin.zou · 2023-06-08T01:14:01.089Z

The firmware does not support this configuration at this time.

pascalost · 2023-07-27T06:21:41.633Z

Hello, I have the same router (gl-ax1800) and need to have multiple vpn clients. Can you please share your configuration files? Thanks

Cal · 2023-07-27T09:45:55.571Z

Check “Route Mode” on this page:

docs.gl-inet.com

VPN Dashboard - GL.iNet Router Docs 4

Documentation for GL.iNet Router Productions

peixotorms · 2023-07-29T10:44:01.566Z

I also have the ax-1800 and axt-1800 and there is only one wireguard connection possible. Some Asus routers actually allow this.
I for example, want to put my media devices behind a vpn in one country, and some other devices behind another.

Praptor · 2023-11-22T07:43:29.780Z

I’m interested in it too. Is there any news about whether and when this function will come?

deverox · 2024-01-04T17:58:52.608Z

This would be great. Ideally could have a 3rd SSId and link that to the additional connection as well.

Basically want to have clean Internet on one SSId, vpn1 on one SSId, and vpn2 on a second SSId.

hansome · 2024-01-09T03:09:35.885Z

s2s and wireguard client can be used at the same time.
While s2s VPN is for company network, wireguard client is for internet.
We’ll evaluate the implementation based on firmware 4.5.

Smarley · 2024-03-09T19:47:17.810Z

With parallel connection would be possible to increase bandwidth on with latency networks?

admon · 2024-03-09T19:52:25.587Z

No, because you would need bonding for it.

alzhao · 2024-03-12T20:41:29.074Z

Smarley:

With parallel connection would be possible to increase bandwidth on with latency networks?

admon:

No, because you would need bonding for it.

This year we will go bandwidth bonding!

admon · 2024-03-12T20:49:57.765Z

Are you sure about this? Afaik WAN bonding requires at least a server-client-construct. Did you mean Link aggregation? This won’t work for WAN - at least this is my state of knowledge so far.

alzhao · 2024-03-12T21:25:56.692Z

admon:

Afaik WAN bonding requires at least a server-client-construct

Yes this is what I mean. I am not sure the difference from a “Link aggregation”.