I think my GL-AR750S-EXT is an exceptional product. It's WiFi reception range surpasses my fancy MacBook Pro.
My question is:
If I upgrade to a newer model such as GL.iNet GL-A1300 or GL.iNet GL-AXT1800(Slate AX) could I expect to get even better Repeater Reception Range than the impressive reception range I get with the GL-AR750S-EXT?
That's a helluva question. I suppose it would really depend on how many other APs you're contending with but I've read the odd report the Flint v1 (AX1800) is enough to cover a mid-sized home (however large/many floors that may be as I don't recall if any figures were given). The Slate AX (AXT1800) is basically the travel version with smaller antennas though the Slate Plus is lighter to pack, IIRC. Theoretically the newer devices should give you access to more uncontested/uncongested channels. They should all allow you to decrease/increase the transmission power of the radios.
I suggest finding the iOS equivalent of:
Side note: I've also read the odd comment that some 'digital nomads' consider the original Slate a superior product due to its light weight. You may have a tiny gold nugget on your hands.
Admittedly, replacing the device can’t fully guarantee an increase in its AP coverage range.
But, improvements should be achievable in terms of WiFi performance and the router’s data - processing capabilities.
Thanks for the replies. A note from GL-iNet technical support also confirmed that a newer unit probably would not increase AP distance from main router. Yesterday, when outside house and ~120 feet from Google Wifi Mesh I could still get a usable signal with the AR750S. Weak, but usable. Neither iPhone 16 Pro nor MacBook Pro could see Google WiFi. I thought that was impressive.
I take the AR750S camping and connecting to public WiFi when available. I am always looking for a light weight portable solution to get further away... 