You have been unnecessarily unpleasant from the start, and hiding behind the excuse of 'engaging in discussion' doesn't change the aggressive reality of your tone
Let’s be clear: lecturing a stranger on their 'actual needs' or how they choose to spend their money is not a technical argument. It is simply arrogance
You seem to be confusing a debate about firmware stability with a critique of my personal finances. That is not a valid discussion; it’s just you being judgmental.
You're not wrong here, I've noticed a couple of forum trolls around here. They seem to like to try and be ‘influential’ with their suggestions for products and questions. When in reality, they're showing how they really are.
Constructive feedback is generally welcomed, however - their comments are uncalled for, they tend to comment on something that they don't even own or use, and aggressively negative in the way they approach doing so.
I have a nice spot for them in my ignore list.
I’m not hiding behind anything. I’m making an observation, and a rather obvious one. Someone who bought "pretty much every travel router" is an evident fanboy.
Let’s be clear: I’m not lecturing anyone and I couldn’t care less about your finances or how you spend your money. Buy ten of each router for all I care.
Arrogance is presuming the right to tell a stranger who isn't ready to swallow every decision of the brand you love so much to go elsewhere.
So I’m not the one confused here. Being pleasant with you isn’t my goal, as this isn’t a safe space group. I state my opinion whether it’s comfortable for you, or anyone else here, or not.
Hey guys, I think you can continue your discussion on PM.
Let’s talk about the Slate 7 Pro here.
I guess if we want tri-band WiFi 7 and no screen on a travel router, we’ll have to wait for the Beryl 7 Pro 
Looks like mostly the same specs (except for the screen on top, 6G and 1GB of flash vs 512MB on the base model)? Would be worth it to me if they increased memory and/or finally enabled swap in the OS.