so bridges work on the new 4.5.7 beta , but lan did not wanted to work for internet for me that is fine but something isn’t right, hence this probably would work under normal environments but not under a dumbap one.
upon inspection I see this in my routing table:
default via 10.234.53.1 dev eth1 proto static src 10.234.53.3 metric 10 <- gateway
10.33.77.0/24 dev br-zigbee proto kernel scope link src 10.33.77.120
10.234.53.0/24 dev eth1 proto static scope link metric 10
10.234.80.0/24 dev br-wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 10.234.80.2
10.234.81.0/24 dev br-wlan1 proto kernel scope link src 10.234.81.4
192.168.8.0/24 dev br-lan proto static scope link linkdown
and my network config:
click to expand
root@GL-MT6000:/etc/config# cat /etc/config/network
config interface 'loopback'
option device 'lo'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '127.0.0.1'
option netmask '255.0.0.0'
config globals 'globals'
option ula_prefix '<snip>'
config device
option name 'br-lan'
option type 'bridge'
list ports 'lan1'
list ports 'lan2'
list ports 'lan3'
list ports 'lan4'
list ports 'lan5'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config device
option name 'lan1'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config device
option name 'lan2'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config device
option name 'lan3'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config device
option name 'lan4'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config device
option name 'lan5'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config interface 'lan'
option device 'br-lan'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '192.168.8.1'
option netmask '255.255.255.0'
option isolate '0'
option delegate '0'
option ip4table 'main'
config device
option name 'eth1'
option macaddr '<snip>'
config interface 'wan'
option device 'eth1'
option proto 'dhcp'
option ipv6 '0'
option metric '10'
option force_link '1'
option delegate '0'
config rule 'policy_direct_rt'
option lookup 'main'
option suppress_prefixlength '0'
option priority '1100'
config rule 'policy_default_rt_vpn'
option mark '0x8000/0xc000'
option lookup '8000'
option priority '1101'
option invert '1'
config rule6 'policy_direct_rt6'
option lookup 'main'
option suppress_prefixlength '0'
option priority '1100'
config rule6 'policy_default_rt_vpn6'
option mark '0x8000/0xc000'
option lookup '8000'
option priority '1101'
option invert '1'
config device
option type 'bridge'
option name 'br-wlan0'
option bridge_empty '1'
option ipv6 '0'
list ports 'eth1.50'
config interface 'wlan0'
option device 'br-wlan0'
option proto 'dhcp'
option delegate '0'
option force_link '1'
option defaultroute '0'
config device
option type 'bridge'
option name 'br-wlan1'
option bridge_empty '1'
option ipv6 '0'
list ports 'eth1.51'
config interface 'wlan1'
option device 'br-wlan1'
option proto 'dhcp'
option delegate '0'
option force_link '1'
option defaultroute '0'
config device
option type 'bridge'
option name 'br-zigbee'
option bridge_empty '1'
option ipv6 '0'
list ports 'eth1.52'
config interface 'zigbee'
option device 'br-zigbee'
option proto 'dhcp'
option delegate '0'
option force_link '1'
option defaultroute '0'
config interface 'modem_1_1_2_6'
option proto 'dhcpv6'
option disabled '1'
option device '@modem_1_1_2'
option reqprefix 'auto'
option reqaddress 'try'
option defaultroute '0'
wifi has other interfaces selected wlan0,wlan1,zigbee.
also dnsmasq and firewall are stopped and disabled, what would make the lan interface time out?, it should follow the default gateway from the default route checkbox but somehow that is not happening its stopped at the first hop (the router itself).
as for wireless its going solid 161.55mb/s on 20mhz 2.4ghz, and with 5ghz 160mhz I see 371.09mb/s more likely 400mb/s since its split routed to vpn upstream, if i enable packet steering my speed becomes a little slower, though I have seen faster speeds on the first beta with mediatek sdk i reached there around 200mb/s.
on the OpenWrt snapshot (self compiled forked from r25345-c6319de48b), it is little becoming better on a ax device I was able to reach over 100mb/s on 2.4ghz, but the downwards degradation of the overall wireless quality was still there I had internet in the kitchen but already under 50mb/s, maybe it is a small bit improved but still not enough if i compare it to what i was able to reach with flint 1 outside of my flat or with the mediatek sdk
^ I haven’t tested 802.1N
edit there seem also issues with the guest wireless network, isolation shows off but its still isolating…