hello, and thanks for taking the time to read this topic.
i am long time user of gl-inet products
— microrouter usb stick
— ar750s-ext
in the past, for 5+ years, at work, i run opnsense on a 8+ year old computer.
now, i just purchased the gl-mt3000 and its performance seems much worse.
my internet connection is verizon fios, 5 static ip, max upload is approx. 40MiB/s
the issue is not upload speeds, are both routers can saturate the internet connection.
the issue is latency.
i am very confused about these results, is the gl-mt3000 doing something extra to produce the poor results?
as an example, i run rclone to upload a .iso to idrive e2.
using that 8+ year old computer, the latency is consistently the same as if i were not uploading at all.
Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=59
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=59
where as, with the gl-mt3000, the latency increases are in direct proportion to upload speed.
using rclone with --bw-limit=10M, the latency is close the same as not uploading
using rclone with --bw-limit=20M, the latency increases to
Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=59
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=226ms TTL=59
using rclone without bw-limit, the latency increases to
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=377ms TTL=59
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=362ms TTL=59
Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=346ms TTL=59
