It's close to the Slate AX, and a bit stronger, I mean WireGuard speed.
I think it may not support this USB-C to RJ-45 peripheral.
It's close to the Slate AX, and a bit stronger, I mean WireGuard speed.
I think it may not support this USB-C to RJ-45 peripheral.
It's close to the Slate AX, and a bit stronger, I mean WireGuard speed.
I think it may not support this USB-C to RJ-45 peripheral.
You’re referring to IP68, right?
What about flashing to vanilla OpenWRT?
I honestly don't remember what it was originally with my Slate AX. but I guess we can probably use something like this with the side USB port? Amazon.com: SANDISK 512GB Extreme Fit USB-C Flash Drive - Up to 400MB/s Read speeds, USB 3.2 Gen 1, USB Type-C - Plug-and-Stay Storage - Black - SDCZ530-512G-G46 : Electronics
Yes, we did design these functions on the screen, which will be more convenient to use.
2 Likes
Congratulations to whoever won on the 23rd.
Will you be responding to Ubiquiti?
The Mudi 7 obliterates that travel router
2 Likes
Yes. The cost will be higher.
Vanilla OpenWRT may not be supported.
It supported for mobile storage, tethering, etc.
But not support various USBC-RJ45 network adapter, wireless network adapter, etc.
1 Like
I believe the Mudi 7 is absolutely an all-rounder.
What can a piece of paper-thin battery do, with such short battery life? And the WiFi 5? It sacrificed everything just to keep it slim — Completely pointless.
5 Likes
that's fine; that's all I need!
it's goofy, honestly. adding this to my pile of reasons I tell people “friends don't let friends buy UBNT” 
I know people really like their management software but I would much rather have the built in freedom to use LuCi, etc. as needed. Mudi 7 is just a wildly more powerful device.
Will Glinet hit back with a roast video?
1 Like
In other words, highly unlikely, and this will be e-waste after support ends. I'm guessing the Mudi 7 won't have a MediaTek chipset.
I don't disagree with you, but if you're not going to implement vanilla OpenWRT support, please support the Mudi 7 for at least 5 years. GL.iNet must and can do better. I've supported you guys with the Beryl AX and Slate 7!
If the modem is Quectel, GL tend to marry it up with a Qualcomm Atheros CPU.
See Collie, Spitz, Puli, and the original Mudi.
The only exceptions to this is the Spitz AX and the Puli AX.
Now if it is a Qualcomm, it's probably an ipq5312.
Now the e5800 name suggests it is a BE5800 device, the only other device with this is the Netgear MR7400.
1 Like
We’re not that bored! We just want to do our own thing well.
There will certainly be at least 5 years of the Mudi 7 firmware support. Even if the SDK can’t be updated with new features after 4 years, they will still be maintaining security updates, for example Spitz:
2 Likes
That’s awesome. I don’t think Chinese companies have a reputation in the West for long-term support. Maybe you can pass this to your other team members and CEO. I would hope GL.iNet would make a similar statement like how Apple, Google, and Samsung would update their products. Five years is great. The longer, the better. A firm statement would inspire confidence in your products.
Maybe in a future update of the Mudi, consider making a separate battery charger? I could see the Mudi being heavily used, and swapping batteries may be helpful. It’s probably an edge case. An even better idea? Add a USB-C port to the battery and let it be charged outside of the Mudi. Please still consider selling the battery separately.
Thank you!
1 Like
Yep, if sell the batteries individually, I think a battery charging dock should be considered for sale.
3 Likes