I tried it for 10 minutes but unfortunately the WiFi performance was incredible worse.
What can we do with flint 2 and apple devices when we have problems with buffering ?
Can you try on the op24 Firmware manual Channel Like 40 for 5ghz
Due to interferences with my Smarthome (matter over Thread, zigbee) this isn’t possible.
@bruce exactly what does the new feature “Added HTTPS support for RTTY” describing? Is it only for GoodCloud access?
Are you referring that exports profiles in OpenVPN server, there is no GL DDNS domain that is optional in your router?
What firmware version and router model are?
1 Like
The v4.8.0-op24 has been released.
Yes, just for GoodCloud remote access.
Hello,
We did not reproduce this issue locally.
In order to narrow the scope of the issue, please downgrade the firmware to v4.7.7 and observe it again.
Are the buffer problems you mentioned low for WIFI?
Please test speed with speedtest.net in clients, including wired and wireless client internet speeds.
With 4.77 absolutely no problems for months.
After upgrade to 4.81 RC I got buffering / reload problems via WiFi. First I had DNS in mind but the problem occurs with Cloudflare and ControlD DNS Servers.
1 Like
Agree with others, OP24 4.8 on the F2 is WAY BETTER perf and stability wise over 4.8.1 on F2. Make OP24 the mainline firmware it’s ready!
3 Likes
OMG, it’s hidden now. So we now need to click on the address window to see the popup with the DDNS hostname now. OK. 
Is there something new about this? I tried the 4.8.1 release today and the 4.8.3 snapshot but it still does not work. So I’m currently still using 4.7.x with the “Auto Detect” Mode.
hi all, i created 2 vlans on a interface but all clients connected to this interface are not shown in Clients page
flint 2 v4.8 op24
Why is OP24 not the standard for Flint 2?
Personally, I’ve not experienced any performance issues with it. But I also haven’t done much testing.
1 Like
When the Flint v2 first launched the MediaTek SDK offered a noticeably performance increase over stock OWRT. GL still advertises those rates based on MTSDK but the gap seems to have since started closing using 'pure'/'vanilla' OWRT.
My question is whether this performance gap still exists.
If I had a Flint v2 I'd tell 'ya. Until then these forums support Markdown. Why don't you open a new thread? I'd be interested to read your results:
It’s difficult to say, on one hand you have MTK SDK which comes with all the propetairy boosts and hacks which normal OpenWrt never would add, in theory it is expected to have something more.
On the other hand, mtk sdk isn’t the most up to date kernel, and because it is older it can have different levels of limitations like how OpenWrt communicates with the drivers in MTK, luci which doesn’t support half of the things as a example, or the 2.5gb port being negotiated to 1gb or being unstable.
And then you have also the developers of the router firmware itself, what I have noticed as outsider, is that firmwares often are hurried and maybe even not cleanly compiled, and I myself are still in debate wether it also happens they switch toolchains like this, this raises my concern because that surely can impact performance and introduce broken packages and unstable firmware, mtk sdk != OpenWrt 24 in that regard, OpenWrts build system is very sensitive for this.
Why I suspect this, is that I noticed alot of indications for space problems, some packages do nothing like iperf3 not giving output, often that is a sign of being compiled in the wrong tool chain, there are also alot of packages removed.
So maybe I’m wrong, but I think MTK SDK would still see more performance, but only if the toolchain is not contaminated or patch left overs are patching wrongly, if they cross compile between op24 and mtk sdk or vice versa, imho they should be two separated work spaces to keep it abstract.
In the end we cannot see what actually happens behind the scenes 
3 Likes
Hi @bruce , I don’t see a final release of v4.8.0-op24 in the GL.iNet download center | GL-MT6000 Flint 2 section. Can you provide the link.
With the O.P. releases, can the change logs be provided, just like the snapshot notes? It would be useful to know which changes have been made to O.P. compared to the snapshot.
Thanks.
1 Like
I believe he is referring to the OP24 in the beta folder, which is out for a month now. It runs very stable on my MT-3000 and MT-6000. Both great routers with OP24 4.8.0, I have to say.
I wish they would release for all routers OpenWRT 24.10.2 versions.
4 Likes