Fixed the problem of blue screen on some computers after connecting to wifi
Fixed the problem of not connecting the network cable or not being able to access the web management interface during pppoe process
Fixed the issue where WAN port gateway information displays abnormally after setting static routing
Fixed the problem that the WAN port negotiation rate is abnormal when the 2.5G network port is inserted into the 1G port and then the 2.5G network port is inserted.
Fixed the problem of being unable to access the web remotely through wan2 and relay IP
Optimize portal features.
Vulnerability fixes
Fixed a vulnerability related to log download.
Fixed a vulnerability that caused the router to fail to log in if special characters were entered.
@alex_zheng that is a good move to go to the current base 23.05. Will lower your maintenance costs quite a bit as many problems are resolved in the later base. You won’t need to backport fixes like you do for 21.02.
With 1 stream not possible. Laptops and small devices with 1 stream (1 antenna) will be limited to much less than 400 Mbps. With 2 streams, in very ideal conditions with 160 Mhz channels, you can connect to the router at 800 Mbps - 1.1 Gbps. After overhead for signaling which is about 30%, you are down to at most 700 Mbps in ideal conditions. So, someone with a desktop PC with an AX210 card with 2 antennas might connect at 1.1 Gbps, but practically get around 500 - 600 Mbps of throughput.
The question itself is pretty useless because it won’t tell anyone much. “Will driving over a dirt track slow down my 300 hp machine?” - yes but this isn’t because of the 300 hp, but because of the dirt track. Same with Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi itself won’t slow it down - bad connection does.
There are also other factors than noise in the frequency band. I believe that the halfed WiFi speed is maybe caused by the wireguard MTU.
Does anyone of you get a faster connection when using the hardware acceleration?
I have much better WiFi speeds than 600Mbit when using a Fritz 1200 AX (AP mode, 160Mhz, 2400 Mbit) maxing out the 1Gbit LAN speed.
The normale rule is:
Expected throughput = Data Rate x 0.65
So with a 160 MHz connection of 2400Mbit you should be able to expect a real world throughput of upto 1500Mbit, while being in the same room of the WiFi router.
I know very well that these are not errors… but it is frustrating that such a new device… if I want to check my logs… I would like to see the real errors of the device… something that other devices with the same hardware do not have. …
Logs are used for knowing what’s going on. If you need to find errors, you can always filter these logs by using grep. Log noise isn’t useful, I agree with that, but it’s not really bad either.
For debugging purposes, it’s totally valid! For a user interface, where the majority of the public will not interact or do not need this information, it only pollutes and overloads the interface!
I always put myself in the shoes of my customer who chooses me and what I recommend him to buy… How do you tell him: Write “GREP”, do you have to explain everything to him in detail? Isn’t it better to have these “mistakes” correct in the bud and also having good community support stressing out your life 24/7 is a huge plus for you!! I’ll show you my ecosystem… FLINT2 master and two client zyxel ex5601t0, why did I choose this one? Why didn’t I buy another 5601? It’s simple, for me it is more convenient and fast to manage the settings I need from your good webgui, immediately and not wait to try, installing the packages on “naked” openwrt.